4.8 Article

Immunoprevention of HER-2/neu transgenic mammary carcinoma through an interleukin 12-engineered allogeneic cell vaccine

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 64, Issue 11, Pages 4001-4009

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2984

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the ability of cytokine-engineered allogeneic (H-2degrees) HER-2/neu-positive cells to prevent tumor development in mammary cancer-prone virgin female BALB/c (H-2(d)) mice transgenic for the transforming rat HER-2/neu oncogene (BALB-neuT mice). Repeated vaccinations with cells engineered to release interleukin (IL)-2, IL-12, IL-15, or IFN-gamma showed that IL-12-engineered cell vaccines had the most powerful immunopreventive activity, with >80% of 1-year-old BALB-neuT mice free of tumors. On the contrary all of the untreated mice and all of the mice vaccinated with IL-12-engineered cells lacking either HER-2/neu or allogeneic antigens developed mammary carcinomas within 22 or 33 weeks, respectively. Whole mount, histology, immunohistochemistry, and gene expression profile analysis showed that vaccination with IL-12-engineered cells maintained 26-week mammary glands free of neoplastic growth, with a gene expression profile that clustered with that of untreated preneoplastic glands. The IL-12-engineered cell vaccine elicited a high production of IFN-gamma and IL-4 and a strong anti-HER-2/neu antibody response. Immune protection was lost or markedly impaired in BALB-neuT mice lacking IFN-gamma or antibody production, respectively. The protection afforded by the IL-12-engineered cell vaccine was equal to that provided by the systemic administration of recombinant IL-12 in combination with HER-2/neu H-2(q) cell vaccine. However, IL-12-engineered cell vaccine induced much lower circulating IL-12 and IFN-gamma, and therefore lower potential side effects and systemic toxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available