4.5 Article

Isolation and identification of fish pathogen Edwardsiella tarda from mariculture in China

Journal

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 13-17

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.02101.x

Keywords

antibiotics susceptibility; aquaculture; chloramphenicol resistance; Edwardsiella tarda; pathogenicity

Categories

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA100310]
  2. Ministry of Agriculture [nyhyzx07-046]
  3. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B505]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The causative agent was isolated from diseased turbots (Scophthalmus maximus) stricken by a high-mortality outbreak of bacterial septicaemia occurring in a mariculture farm in Yantai, a northern coastal city of China. Seven pure isolates, namely EH-15, EH-103, EH-107, EH-202, EH-203, EH-305 and EH-306, belonged to Edwardsiella tarda. The phenotypic features of the cultures were analysed extensively. Three of the isolates showed high 16S rDNA sequence similarities with E. tarda sequence (GenBank accession no. EF467289). However, unlike the E. tarda ATCC 15947, all the isolates, except EH-15, contained a novel large plasmid sized about 23.7 kb. Furthermore, pathogenicity of the isolates was addressed by experimental challenges with fish models. The isolates exhibited strong virulence to swordtail fish with LD50 ranging between 3.8 x 10(3) and 3.8 x 10(5) CFU g(-1), and EH-202 displaying the lowest LD50 value among them. Antibiotic susceptibilities of E. tarda isolates were assayed. Compared with E. tarda ATCC 15947, the isolates displayed strong resistance to chloramphenicol, and the probable dominant chloramphenicol resistance determinant was cat III. Depicting the main biological properties of turbot-borne E. tarda strains in China, the study provided useful information for further unveiling their pathogenic mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available