4.7 Article

Gastric cancer: Establishing predictors of biologic behavior with use of population-based data

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 629-635

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2004.09.002

Keywords

adenocarcinoma; neoplasm invasiveness; prognosis; stomach neoplasm; survival analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Tumor thickness and nodal status are important predictors of survival following curative resection for gastric cancer. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a potential predictor of biological behavior. The relationship between LVI and tumor thickness (T status) has not been established in population-based studies. Methods: Clinicopathological and survival data of 577 patients at nine centers, from between 1991 and 1997, was collected from patient records and a Provincial Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint of the study was death. A secondary analysis of a node-negative subgroup examined the significance of LVI with respect to T status. Results: The population disease-specific survival was 28%. In a multivariate analysis, T, N, M, esophageal margin, tumor morphology, and residual tumor category were independent predictors of survival. LVI was documented in 58% of resected tumors. LVI correlated with advancing T and N status but was not significant in a multivariate population model. Subgroup analysis of node-negative gastric cancer found T status and LVI to be independent predictors of survival. LVI was associated with a 5-year survival of 8%, versus 43% among patients in whom it was absent (P < .001). Conclusions: T status and N status were the most important independent predictors of survival in a population-based study of gastric cancer. LVI correlated with advancing N and T status. Multivariate analysis of node-negative patients showed LVI and T status are independent predictors of survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available