4.3 Article

Quantitative histology by multicolor slide-based cytometry

Journal

CYTOMETRY PART A
Volume 59A, Issue 2, Pages 210-219

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20054

Keywords

histographic mapping; lymph node; immunofluorescence; LSC; quantitative histology; multiple thresholding; tissue cytometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In lymphatic organs, the quantitative analysis of the spatial distribution of leukocytes by tissue cytometry would give relevant information about alterations during diseases (leukemia, HIV, AIDS) and their therapeutic regimen, as well as in experimental settings. Methods. We have developed a semiautomated analysis method for laser scanning cytometry (LSC) termed multiple thresholding, which is suitable for archived or fresh biopsy material of human lymph nodes and tonsils. Sections arc stained with PI for nuclear DNA and up to four antigens using direct or indirect immunofluorescence staining. Measurement is triggered on DNA-fluorescence (argon laser, At) or on specific cell labeling. Due to the heterogeneity of cell density, measurements are performed repeatedly at different threshold levels (low threshold: regions of low cellular density, germinal center; high threshold: dense regions, mantle zone). Data are acquired by single- (At) or dual-laser excitation (Ar-HeNe) in order to analyze single- (FITC) tip to four-color (FITC/PE/PECy5/APC) stained specimen. Results: Percentage and cellular density of cell-subsets is quantified in different microanatomical regions of the specimen. These data were highly correlated with manual scoring of identical specimens (r 2 = 0.96, P < 0.0001). With LSC, semiautomated operator-independent immuno-phenotyping in tissue sections of lymphatic organs with up to three antibodies simultaneously is possible. Conclusions: We expect this tissue cytometric approach to yield new insight into processes during diseases and help to quantify the success of therapeutic interventions. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available