4.5 Article

Influence of dietary menadione nicotinamide bisulphite (vitamin K3) and phylloquinone (vitamin K1) on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) tissue levels, determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection

Journal

AQUACULTURE NUTRITION
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 637-647

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2009.00703.x

Keywords

Atlantic salmon; high performance liquid chromatography; menadione nicotinamide bisulphite; requirement; tailoring; tissue retention; vitamin K

Categories

Funding

  1. The Research Council of Norway [153472, 165251]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to investigate the retention of menadione nicotinamide bisulphite (MNB, Vitamin K-3) and phylloquinone (vitamin K-1) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L) Another objective was to find a reliable method for determination of menadione in fish feed, and to include and validate more matrices in the methods for phylloquinone and menaquinones (vitamin K-2) Duplicate tanks of Atlantic salmon (similar to 93 g) were fed four levels (0-1000 mg menadione kg(-1) feed) of MNB for 9 weeks The concentration of menadione and phylloquinone in the feed and the concentration of phylloquinone and menaquinone 4 (MK 4) an the tissues were determined The analysed concentration of dietary menadione found in feed indicated a substantial loss of MNB during feed production This assumption was supported by screening 15 commercial fish feed samples which also revealed menadione concentrations far below the recommended level MNB fed salmon showed only a minor increase in liver MK 4 concentration, compared to salmon fed phylloquinone which had a considerably higher level of liver phylloquinone, indicating a higher retention of phylloquinone compared to menadione in Atlantic salmon Due to highly varying stability and bioavailability of the different vitamin K derivatives, vitamin K supplementation in fish feed needs a revision

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available