4.7 Article

Effects of growth hormone treatment on body proportions and final height among small children with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages E593-E596

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e593

Keywords

growth hormone treatment; hypophosphatemic rickets; growth failure; disproportionate growth; final height

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (XLH) is characterized by rickets, disproportionate short stature, and impaired renal phosphate reabsorption and vitamin D metabolism. Despite oral phosphate and vitamin D treatment, most children with XLH demonstrate reduced adult height. Objective. To determine the beneficial effects of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy on body proportions and adult height among patients with XLH. Methods. Three initially prepubertal short children (age, 9.4-12.9 years) with XLH were treated with rhGH for 3.1 to 6.3 years until adult height was attained. Results. rhGH treatment led to sustained increases in standardized height for all children. The median adult height was 0.9 SD (range: 0.5-1.3 SD) greater than that at the initiation of rhGH treatment and exceeded the predicted adult height by 6.2 cm (range: 5.3-9.8 cm). However, longitudinal growth of the trunk was stimulated more than leg growth. During rhGH treatment, the standardized sitting height increased by 1.6 SD (range: 1.1-2.7 SD), compared with baseline values. In contrast, the median subischial leg length did not change consistently (median change: 0.3 SD; range: -0.1 to 0.6 SD). Conclusion. The increase in final height after rhGH treatment is of potential benefit for children with XLH. However, the exaggeration of disproportionate truncal growth observed for our prepubertal patients is a potential negative effect of treatment and should be confirmed with additional studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available