4.5 Article

Total fish meal replacement with rapeseed protein concentrate in diets fed to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum)

Journal

AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 443-453

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-011-9476-2

Keywords

Fish meal alternative; Rainbow trout; Vegetable protein; Rapeseed protein concentrate

Categories

Funding

  1. European Fisheries Fund
  2. Zukunftsprogramm Fischerei des Landes Schleswig-Holstein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential of rapeseed protein concentrate as fish meal alternative in diets for rainbow trout (initial average weight 37.8 +/- A 1.4 g) was evaluated. Nine experimental tanks of a freshwater flow-through system were stocked with 12 fish each. Triplicate groups of fish received isonitrogenous (47.9 +/- A 0.5% CP) and isoenergetic (22.4 +/- A 0.2 kJ g(-1)) experimental diets with 0, 66 and 100% of fish meal substituted with rapeseed protein concentrate (71.2% CP), thereby providing 0, 29 and 43% of dietary protein. As the amino acid profile of rapeseed protein concentrate was comparable to fish meal, there was no need to supplement experimental diets with synthetic amino acids. At the end of the 84 days of feeding period, fish growth performance, feed intake and feed efficiencies were not compromised, when 100% of fish meal in the control diet was replaced with rapeseed protein concentrate, revealing a SGR of 1.19 or 1.10, a FCR of 1.09 or 1.18 and a feed intake of 78.5 or 74.7 g in fish fed on the control diet or fed the diet devoid of fish meal, respectively. Intestinal morphology did not reveal any histological abnormalities in all dietary groups. Blood parameters including haematocrit and haemoglobin as well as glucose, triglycerides and total protein in the plasma were not different between treatment groups. Thus, the rapeseed protein concentrate tested here has great potential as an alternative to fish meal in rainbow trout diets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available