4.6 Article

Effects of recombinant LH supplementation in women undergoing assisted reproduction with GnRH agonist down-regulation and stimulation with recombinant FSH: an opening study

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 635-643

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61643-4

Keywords

in-vitro fertilization; ovarian stimulation; recombinant FSH; recombinant LH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Circulating endogenous concentrations of LH are reduced in women undergoing down-regulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) and ovarian stimulation with recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH). The effect of recombinant human LH (r-hLH) supplementation on ovarian response and pregnancy outcome was evaluated in a prospective randomized study (sealed envelopes) including 231 cycles. Normogonadotrophic women were stimulated with either r-hFSH or a combination of r-hFSH and r-hLH in a ratio of 2: 1. LH supplementation was started from day 8 of the cycle. Blood samples for oestradiol. LH and androstendione were prospectively collected on days 1. 8 and on the day of aspiration and analysed retrospectively. Overall, the two groups did not differ with respect to pregnancy rate. In contrast, women aged 35 years responded to exogenous LH supplementation with significantly increased implantation rates and significantly reduced total FSH consumption as compared with the non-supplemented group. In addition. the implantation rate for a subgroup of patients with the highest endogenous LH concentrations (i.e. greater than or equal to1.99 IU/I) on day 8 was significantly increased by LH supplementation. Exogenous LH supplementation from day 8 has no detrimental effect on ovarian response and pregnancy outcome. On the contrary supplementation with r-hLH seems to benefit treatment outcome for women above 35 years of age and for the subgroup of women exhibiting LH concentrations above 1.99 IU/I on stimulation day 8.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available