4.3 Article

Phylogenetic relationships among fragmented Asian black bear (Ursus thibetanus) populations in western Japan

Journal

CONSERVATION GENETICS
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 311-323

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:COGE.0000031147.14662.82

Keywords

colonisation; genetic differentiation; genetic diversity; mtDNA control region; threatened local populations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number of Asian black bears (Ursus thibetanus) in Japan has been reduced and their habitats fragmented and isolated because of human activities. Our previous study examining microsatellite DNA loci revealed significant genetic differentiation among four local populations in the western part of Honshu. Here, an approximate 700-bp nucleotide sequence of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region was analysed in 119 bears to infer the evolutionary history of these populations. Thirteen variable sites and variation in the number of Ts at a T-repeat site were observed among the analysed sequences, which defined 20 mtDNA haplotypes with the average sequence divergence of 0.0051 (SD = 0.00001). The observed haplotype frequencies differed significantly among the four populations. Phylogeographic analysis of the haplotypes suggested that black bears in this region have gone through two different colonisation histories, since the observed haplotypes belonged to two major monophyletic lineages and the lineages were distributed with an apparent border. The spatial genetic structure revealed by using mtDNA was different from that observed using microsatellite DNA markers, probably due to female philopatry and male-biased dispersal. Since nuclear genetic diversity will be lost in the three western populations because of the small population size and genetic isolation, their habitats need to be preserved, and these four populations should be linked to each other by corridors to promote gene flow from the easternmost population with higher nuclear genetic diversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available