4.7 Article

Reduction of anxiety after restricted feeding in the rat: Implication for eating disorders

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 55, Issue 11, Pages 1075-1081

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.01.026

Keywords

restricted feeding; anxiety-like behavior; meal structure; locomotor activity; eating disorders

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [AA05563] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK26741] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Eating-disorder patients exhibit not only abnormal eating attitudes but also pathologic anxiety-like behaviors. The specific nature of the relationship between dieting and anxiety-like behavior is unknown. Methods: To investigate the adaptational changes that resulted from chronic restricted scheduled feeding (2-hour access per day for 2 weeks) and subsequent free refeeding, longitudinal changes in the microstructure of feeding behavior were studied in male rats. To study the relationship between restricted feeding and anxiety-like behavior, separate rats were tested in the elevated plus-maze under the following conditions. 1) free feeding; 2) acute food restriction (2-hour access for 1 day); 3) chronic food restriction (for 10 days); or 4) postrecovery (after 10 days of free feeding subsequent to chronic food restriction). Results: The effects of chronic food restriction on meal structure diminished within a few days after refeeding. Decreased anxiety-like behavior was seen during acute and chronic food restriction and did not reflect nonspecific behavioral activation. Anxiolytic-like effects persisted after 10 days of refeeding. Conclusions: Chronic food restriction produced reductions in anxiety-like behavior that persisted beyond the normalization of food intake patterns. The findings might have etiologic and pathophysiologic relevance for the restrained eating pattern in eating-disorder patients with comorbid anxious symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available