4.7 Article

Introduction of rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis) during pikeperch first feeding

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 497, Issue -, Pages 260-268

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.08.004

Keywords

Pikeperch; Larvae; Rotifers; First feeding; Fatty acids

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic - project CENAKVA [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0024]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic - project CENAKVA II (NPU I program) [LO1205]
  3. project Reproductive and genetic procedures for preserving fish biodiversity and aquaculture [CZ.02.1.01./0.0/0.0/16_025/0007370]
  4. [NAZV QJ1510117]
  5. [NAZV QK1820354]
  6. [GAJU 060/2016/Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis) on pikeperch performance during first feeding was investigated. Significant differences between treatments were found in length, body weight, survival, feed consumption, fatty acid composition, and RNA/DNA ratio. Pikeperch larvae (Sander lucioperca) were reared under three different diets (artemia nauplii (A), artemia nauplii/rotifers (B), and rotifers (C)), during the first 17 days post hatch (dph). Final performance parameters in total length, myomere height (MH), body weight, eye diameter, stomach fullness, survival, fatty acid composition, and RNA/DNA ratio were measured and compared among treatments. In terms of growth (length, body weight, and myomere height) and stomach fullness, the larvae from treatment B excelled over the other two treatments. Survival and key fatty acids such as docosahexaeonic acid (DHA) were higher in treatment C. Results suggest that the most favorable diet during larval pikeperch first feeding is a mixed diet (rotifers/artemia). This feeding method can significantly increase efficiency of pikeperch larval culture on a commercial scale. Yet, more accurate weaning protocols of this diet during the first 12-17 dph need to be developed to further improve larval performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available