4.1 Article

Markers of cadmium exposure in workers in a cadmium pigment factory after changes in the exposure conditions

Journal

TOXICOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH
Volume 20, Issue 1-5, Pages 51-56

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1191/0748233704th189oa

Keywords

beta 2-microglobulin; cadmium; renal tubular dysfunction; worker; working environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to assess changes in concentrations of cadmium in the blood (Cd-B), cadmium in the urine (Cd-U), beta(2)-microglobulin in the serum (beta(2)-mG-S) and beta(2)-microglobulin in the urine (beta(2)-mG-U) of workers at a cadmium (Cd) pigment factory in Japan in which exposure conditions improved. We evaluated reversibility of these markers in continuously employed workers in relation to changes in exposure levels resulting from improvements in the workplace and the reduced production of Cd. Our study involved both environmental and biological monitoring. Data were collected for four years. We measured the Cd concentration in the air of each work area, using the time-weighted average (TWA). Cd-B and Cd-U were measured in workers as direct indices of Cd exposure. beta(2)-mG-S and beta(2)-mG-U were measured as markers of renal tubular function. Exposure levels were high in all work areas, according to the criteria set by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Workers' Cd-B and Cd-U concentrations reflected high levels of exposure. Correlation was found between these direct indices and beta(2)-mG-S concentrations. Since the second year, ambient Cd concentrations decreased and reacted markers have been improved. Our results suggest that Cd-B, Cd-U, beta(2)-mG-S and beta(2)-mG-U are appropriate markers for monitoring both the level of Cd exposure and the tubular function of workers. Reversibility of urinary low molecular weight protein was observed in the workers over the four years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available