4.6 Article

Inhibition of B16BL6 tumor progression by coadministration of recombinant angiostatin K1-3 and endostatin genes with cationic liposomes

Journal

CANCER GENE THERAPY
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 441-449

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700716

Keywords

angiostatin; endostatin; antiangiogenesis; cationic liposomes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transfection of the antiangiogenic angiostatin and endostatin genes was shown to be an alternative to high-dose administration of angiostatin or endostatin proteins for cancer therapy. We have systematically investigated whether coadministration of the mouse angiostatin kringle 1-3 gene (pFLAG-AngioK1/3) and the endostatin gene (pFLAG-Endo) complexed with cationic liposomes exhibits enhanced therapeutic efficacy. In vitro, the coexpressed mixture of angiostatin K1-3 and endostatin more effectively reduced angiogenesis in chorioallantoic membranes than either angiostatin K1-3 or endostatin alone. In vivo, subcutaneous coadministration of pFLAG-AngioK1/3 and pFLAG-Endo lipoplexes more effectively inhibited vascularization in Matrigel plugs implanted in mice than either one alone. Additionally, subcutaneous administration of these genes inhibited the growth and formation of pulmonary metastases of B16BL6 melanoma cells in mice. Compared to treatment with an empty vector, treatment with pFLAG-AngioK1/3 plus pFLAG-Endo inhibited 81% of tumor growth, while treatment with pFLAG-AngioK1/3 or pFLAG-Endo inhibited tumor growth 70 and 69%, respectively. Cotreatment with the two plasmids after primary tumor excision induced a 90% inhibition of pulmonary metastases versus 79% for pFLAG-AngioK1/3 or 80% for pFLAG-Endo individually. These results suggest that combined administration of angiostatin K1-3 and endostatin genes complexed with cationic liposomes may be an innovated antiangiogenic strategy for cancer therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available