4.7 Article

The effects of feeding frequency on growth and reproduction in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 368, Issue -, Pages 103-108

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.09.022

Keywords

Zebrafish; Danio rerio; Feeding frequency; Reproduction; Growth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, we examined the effects of feeding regime on growth and reproductive performance in wild-type zebrafish (Danio rerio) maintained on a recirculating aquaculture system. Starting at 30 days post-fertilization (dpf), we fed 8 replicate groups of age and strain matched fish a pelleted formulated diet (Gemma Micro 300, Skretting) either once every other day (EOD), one time (1x), three times (3x) or five times (5x) a day to achieve a total daily feed input of 5% of body weight per day compared against a standard control (C) of Artemia salina nauplii/metanauplii three times daily to apparent satiation. Fish in each treatment group were weighed and measured for fork length once every other week until 150 dpf. We evaluated the effects of these feeding regimes on reproductive performance (breeding success, fecundity, and embryo viability) by setting up randomly sampled fish from each replicate groups in small group crosses (2 males, 3 females) once every other week starting at 76 dpf until the experiment was terminated at 191 dpf. Growth performance was significantly affected by feeding regime, especially in female fish, where fish in the 1x, 3x, and 5x groups were significantly (p<0.05, one way ANOVA) longer and heavier than fish in control and EOD groups at the end of experiment. Feeding regime had a less clear effect on reproductive performance. Mean fecundity and embryo viability varied little between groups, but the fish fed EOD, 1x and 3x showed significantly higher rates (p<0.05) of breeding success than the control and 5x groups. These results suggest that feeding regimes most conducive to growth do not necessarily maximize reproductive success in this species. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available