4.7 Article

Effects of dietary oxidized fish oil with vitamin E supplementation on growth performance and reduction of lipid peroxidation in tissues and blood of red sea bream Pagrus major

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 356, Issue -, Pages 73-79

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.05.034

Keywords

Oxidized lipid; Red sea bream; Vitamin E; TBARS; Oxidative stress

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MONBUKAGAKUSHO)
  2. Management Expenses Grants of the United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study was conducted to determine the effects of dietary oxidized fish oil (OFO) and vitamin E (VE) supplementation on growth and reduction of oxidative stress in juvenile red sea bream. An 8-week feeding trial on juveniles (average weight of 1.8 g) was conducted in triplicate groups with test diets containing two degrees of OFO (83.8 and 159.0 meq/kg) supplement with three levels of VE (0, 100 and 200 ppm), respectively. Fresh fish oil (13.5 meq/kg) with supplementation of 100 ppm VE was employed as control group. No significant differences were found on growth performance between fish fed with 100 or 200 ppm VE supplemented groups and control group. However, fish fed without VE supplement diets indicated significantly lower growth than control group. Increased dietary VE levels led to reduce liver thiobarbituric acid reactive substances value, while the highest value was observed in fish fed high OFO without VE supplemented diets. Liver vitamin C concentrations increased with increasing dietary VE levels. In conclusion, the results demonstrated that dietary OFO increased the oxidative stress condition of fish, but supplement of more than 100 mg/kg VE may prevent tissues from lipid oxidation, and improve growth and health of juvenile red sea bream. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available