4.7 Article

Mitochondrial metabolism underlies hyperoxic cell damage

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 36, Issue 11, Pages 1460-1470

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.03.005

Keywords

mitochondria; reactive oxygen species; hyperoxia; respiration; oxygen tolerance; free radicals

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK58882] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exposure of mammals to hyperoxia causes pulmonary and ocular pathology. Hyperoxic damage and cell death may derive from enhanced intracellular formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), probably of mitochondrial origin. There is, however, controversy on this point. When wild-type and respiration-deficient (rhodegrees) HeLa cells were cultured in 80% O-2, wild-type cells stopped growing after 5 days and died thereafter whereas rhodegrees cells survived and grew to confluence. This tolerance of rhodegrees cells for hyperoxia was not associated with greater resistance to oxidants such as hydrogen peroxide and t-butyl hydroperoxide. Under both 20% and 80% O-2, rhodegrees cells exhibited substantially decreased ROS production, and, under 80% O-2, rhodegrees cells showed no suppression of aconitase activity or mitochondrial protein carbonyl formation. Replacement of normal mitochondria in p' cells restored ROS production and susceptibility to hyperoxia. Two other approaches that diminished mitochondrial ROS generation also increased tolerance for hyperoxia. HeLa cells constantly exposed to the protonophoric uncoupler carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, which enhances respiration-but decreases ROS production, showed preferential survival under 80% O-2, as did HeLa cells treated with chloramphenicol, which suppresses both respiration and mitochondrial ROS production. We conclude that interactions between respiring mitochondria and O-2 are primarily responsible for hyperoxic cell damage. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available