4.6 Article

SED, age distribution and evolutionary history of M 33

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 420, Issue 1, Pages 89-96

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040102

Keywords

galaxies : individual : M 33; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : stellar content

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present CCD spectrophotometry of the nearby spiral galaxy M33 using images obtained with National Astronomical Observatories of China (NAOC) 60/90 cm Schmidt telescope in a broad U-band and 13 intermediate-band filters from 4000 to 10000 Angstrom. The observations cover the whole area of M 33, with a total integration of 39.08 h from September 23, 1995 to August 28, 2000. The spectral energy distributions (SEDs) for each area of M33 are obtained. With the aid of all evolutionary synthesis model, PEGASE (Fioc & Rocca-Volmerange 1997, 2000), we compute theoretical SEDs for three kinds of star formation rate (SFR) histories. From best fits on templates of PEGASE and observed SEDs by the chi(2)-minimization procedure, we find that both the constant and exponentially decreasing (hereafter EXP, tau=12 Gyr) SFR give good agreement between models and observations. We then obtain age distributions (when the observed stellar Population formation began) and evolutionary histories of M 33 for the two models. For the constant SFR, an age gradient is clearly found between stellar populations of the central regions and of the outer regions. The stellar populations in its central regions are older than 10 Gyr; stars in the outer regions are younger, about 7 Gyr and the Youngest components in the spiral arms are less than 5 Gyr. The Exp SFR gives a similar age distribution, but with absolute ages that are smaller by similar to2 Gyr. We conclude that M 33 has been forming stars continuously for most of its lifetime, with the interior having built up its stellar populations several Gyr earlier than the outer parts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available