4.7 Article

A population genetic analysis of abalone domestication events in South Africa: Implications for the management of the abalone resource

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 356, Issue -, Pages 235-242

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.05.012

Keywords

Abalone; Aquaculture; Conservation; Domestication; Genetic diversity; Haliotis midae

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation
  2. Innovation Fund (Department of Science and Technology, Republic of South Africa)
  3. International Foundation for Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Abalone culture is South Africa's largest aquaculture sector in terms of revenue. Nonetheless, the industry is in its formative years and much scope remains for refinement and regulation of production practices. It is important to manage genetic diversity in terms of the particular breeding objectives pursued by respective facilities: selective breeding vs. ranching; whilst conserving the genetic integrity of wild populations remains a national imperative. The present study found no significant decrease in genetic diversity between wild and cultured populations as based on heterozygosity and allelic content of genomic-and EST-microsatellite loci. However, estimates for pairwise genotypic differentiation, F-st, AMOVA and Factorial correspondence analysis suggest the genetic heterogeneity of cultured populations and their significant differentiation from the wild progenitor populations. As expected, the cultured population showed reduced effective population sizes, but relatedness remained low. It is postulated that both neutral and selective evolutionary forces are responsible for the observed patterns of genetic variability within and amongst populations. The implications of the results are discussed in terms of broad managerial objectives for the South African abalone and continued monitoring is advised. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available