4.8 Article

Role of hepatic stellate cell/hepatocyte interaction and activation of hepatic stellate cells in the early phase of liver regeneration in the rat

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 910-916

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.02.005

Keywords

Vitamin A-storing cell; desmin; alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA); partial hepatectomy; intravital fluorescence microscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are known to play a role in hepatic regeneration. We investigated hepatocyte/HSC interaction and HSC activation at various times after 70% partial hepatectomy (PHx) in the rat. Methods: The hepatic microcirculation was studied using intravital fluorescence microscopy (IVFM). Desmin and alpha-SMA within liver tissue were detected by immunohistochemistry. In isolated parenchymal liver cells (PLCs) and HSCs, double immunostaining was used to identify activated HSC. Results: Using IVFM, hepatocyte-clusters were often seen in vivo at 3 days after PHx (PHx3). Distance between HSC fell from 61.7 +/- 2.1 mum in controls to 36.1 +/- 1.4 mum (P < 0.001) while the HSC/hepatocyte ratio rose (0.71 +/- 0.01 to 1.08 +/- 0.03; P < 0.001). In >80% of in vivo microscopic fields in the PHx3 group, clusters of HSCs were observed especially near hepatocyte-clusters. At PHx1 and PHx3, > 20% of cells in the PLC-fraction were HSCs which adhered to hepatocytes. At PHx3, in addition to desmin staining, isolated HSCs were also positive for BrdU and alpha-SMA, and formed clusters. HSCs in the HSC-fraction were only positive for desmin which indicated that adherence to hepatocytes is required for HSC activation. Conclusions: Our data suggest that HSCs are activated by adhering to hepatocytes in the early phase of liver regeneration. (C) 2004 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available