4.7 Article

Comparison of the effects of the prebiotics (Bio-Mos® and β-1,3-D-glucan) and the customised probiotics (Pseudomonas synxantha and P-aeruginosa) on the culture of juvenile western king prawns (Penaeus latisulcatus Kishinouye, 1896)

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 289, Issue 3-4, Pages 310-316

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.02.001

Keywords

Immunostimulants; Probiotics; beta-glucan; Bio-Mos (R); Western king prawns; Immune responses; Scanning electron microscope

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigated the effects of dietary immunostimulants on the growth, survival and immune responses of juvenile western king prawns (Penaeus latisulcatus). The immunostimulants used were two prebiotics Bio-Mos (R) and beta-1,3-D-glucan and two customised probiotics; Pseudomonas synxantha and P. aeruginosa. The prawn juveniles (4.63 +/- 0.39 g) were fed the formulated feed (control), supplemented with Bio-Mos (R) at 0.5%, beta-1,3-D-glucan at 0.2% and a combination of two probiotics (10(5) CFU/mL at 50:50 v/v) at 20 mL/kg for 84 days of culture. The specific growth rate (SGR), survival and food conversion ratio (FCR) were higher in the prawns fed the immunostimulants than in the control. Although no significant effects on the SGR, survival and FCR were found when the prawns were fed either any prebiotics or probiotics, the higher survival was observed in the prawns fed the probiotics, while the higher SGR and lower FCR were observed in the prawns fed beta-1,3-D-glucan, which had the most influence in increasing the surface structure of the prawn intestines. The healthier prawns showed the higher total haemocyte count (THC), the lowest clotting time and lowest bacterial load in the haemolymph when they were fed the probiotics. Continuous supplementation with the immunostimulants to the prawns for 84 days showed considerable improvement in the growth, survival and immune response of the prawns. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available