4.4 Article

Encapsulation of bifidobacteria in whey protein-based microcapsules and survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and in yoghurt

Journal

INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 505-515

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2003.10.008

Keywords

immobilization; whey proteins; bifidobacteria; gastrointestinal conditions; yoghurt

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bifidobacterium breve R070 (BB R070) and Bifidobacterium longum R023 (BL R023) were encapsulated as freeze-dried or fresh Cultures in water-insoluble food-grade microcapsules produced by emulsion and/or spray-drying, using milk fat and/or denatured whey proteins as immobilization material. The encapsulation yield differed significantly according to the method and the strain used. Dispersion of fresh cells in heat-treated whey protein Suspension followed by spray-drying was the least destructive immobilization technique tested, with a survival rate of 25.7 +/- 0.1 % and 1.4 +/- 0.2% for BB R070 and BL R023, respectively. Viable counts of BB R070 cells entrapped in whey protein microcapsules using this method were significantly higher than those of free cells after 28 days in yoghurt stored at 4degrees C ( 2.6 log cycles), and after sequential exposure to simulated gastric and intestinal juices ( + 2.7 log cycles). In contrast, no protective effect of encapsulation was observed with BL R023. Immobilization of probiotic cultures in whey protein-based microcapsules can increase cell survival when subjected to extreme conditions, making this approach potentially useful for delivery of viable bacteria to the gastrointestinal tract of humans via dairy fermented products. However, technological properties of the strains, and particularly heat resistance, should be taken into consideration for spray-dry encapsulation of sensitive microorganisms. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available