4.4 Article

Eating behaviours, dietary profile and body composition according to dieting history in men and women of the Quebec Family Study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages 997-1004

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1079/BJN20041115

Keywords

dieting history; three-factor eating questionnaire; dietary patterns; gender differences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of the present cross-sectional study was to compare eating behaviours (cognitive dietary restraint, disinhibition and susceptibility to hunger), dietary profile and physiological variables according to the practice of dieting: current dieting; history of dieting in the 10-year period that preceded the study; no dieting during the same period. Dieting history, anthropometric markers of adiposity, RMR, dietary profile (3 d food record) and eating behaviours (three-factor eating questionnaire) were determined in a sample of 244 men and 352 women. A greater proportion of women (31(.)8%) than men (16(.)8%) reported that they had been on a diet over the past 10 years (P=0(.)0001). In both genders, current and past dieters had a higher BMI (P<0(.)05) than non-dieters and current dieters had lower reported energy intakes than past dieters and non-dieters (only in women) (P<0(.)05). Current and past dieters also had higher scores for all eating behaviours and their subscales (P<0(.)05; except for susceptibility to hunger in men) compared with non-dieters (adjusted for age, reported energy intake, percentage of dietary fat, BMI and RMR). Moreover, for each dieting-history category, women had significantly higher scores for cognitive dietary restraint than men (P<0(.)05). In conclusion, the present study showed that current and past dieters had higher scores for cognitive dietary restraint and disinhibition compared with non-dieters. As disinhibition has previously been associated with a greater risk of subsequent weight gain, interventions aimed at preventing an increase in disinhibition may be promising for long-term weight maintenance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available