3.8 Article

Category-specific modulation of inferior temporal activity during working memory encoding and maintenance

Journal

COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 37-45

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.11.017

Keywords

prefrontal; inferior; temporal; cortex; frontal; lobes; working; memory; executive; control; functional; magnetic resonance imaging; event-related; fMRI; vision; object; face; neuroimaging

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG15793] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH63548, MH63901] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS40813] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Findings from neurophysiology have supported the view that visual working memory (WM) relies on modulation of activity in object-selective populations of neurons in inferior temporal cortex. Here, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated whether similar mechanisms support human visual working memory encoding and maintenance processes. We identified regions in inferior temporal cortex that exhibited category-specific responses during perception of faces (fusiform face area [FFA]) or scenes (parahippocampal place area [PPA]) and investigated whether activity in these regions would be modulated by demands to actively encode and maintain faces and scenes. Results showed that independent of perceptual stimulation, the FFA and PPA exhibited greater encoding- and maintenance-related activity when their favored stimulus was relevant to the recognition task. In contrast, maintenance-related activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) was modulated by memory load, regardless of the type of information that was task relevant. These results are consistent with the view that visual working memory encoding and maintenance processes are implemented through modulation of inferior temporal activity by prefrontal cortex. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available