4.4 Article

Abnormal ascospore morphology in the bud mutant of Neurospora tetrasperma

Journal

FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 582-589

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.01.007

Keywords

ascus development; abnormal ascospore delimitation; ascospore mutants; ascospore lobes; budded ascospores; Neurospora tetrasperma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A recessive ascospore mutant of Neurospora tetrasperma, named bud, was isolated from a wild-collected heterokaryotic strain with four different nuclear components. bud segregates as a single mendelian gene. When bud is homozygous, meiosis is apparently normal but postmeiotic events are not. Abnormal orientation of spindles at the postmeiotic mitosis often results in failed pair-wise association of nuclei and their irregular distribution along the length of the ascus prior to spore delimitation. Consequently, many asci cut out more than four ascospores; some contain no nuclei while others contain more than two. The most dramatic effect of bud is on ascospore delimitation itself. Many ascospores are irregularly shaped and are often interconnected, because of incomplete spore delimitation. Ascospores also show one or two lobes or bud-like extensions of varying sizes. Over 75% of ascospores from bud x bud remain white or tan and are inviable. The interaction of bud with a dominant Eight-spore mutant (E) was examined in both heterozygous and homozygous crosses. When both bud and E are heterozygous, bud has no effect on ascospore delimitation or on the phenotype of E because bud is recessive; many asci produce 5-8 ascospores just as in E x E+. And when bud is homozygous and E is heterozygous, ascospore delimitation is less affected than when E is absent. Moreover, when both bud and E are homozygous, the effect on ascospore development is less extreme than when E is homozygous singly. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available