4.7 Article

Response of early stage spiny lobster Jasus edwardsii phyllosoma larvae to changes in temperature and photoperiod

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 281, Issue 1-4, Pages 63-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.05.035

Keywords

Jasus edwardsii; phyllosoma; growth; temperature; photoperiod

Funding

  1. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Rock Lobster Enhancement and Aquaculture Subprogram
  2. Advancing the Propagation of Rock Lobster [2000/214]
  3. School of Aquaculture of the University of Tasmania

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of temperature and photoperiod on the survival, intermoult period, moult increment and feeding activity were examined in early stage Jasus edwardsii phyllosoma larvae. In the first experiment, growth increment of newly-hatched larvae to Stage 11 was similarly high after rearing at 14.3 and 18.2 degrees C and lowest at 10.5 and 21.5 degrees C, whereas survival to Stage 11 was not significantly different between temperatures. By contrast, almost all Stage II phyllosoma died at 21.5 degrees C but there was no difference in survival from Stages II to IV at 14.3 and 18.2 degrees C, while larvae at the coldest temperature (10.5 degrees C) did not moult beyond Stage II during the experiment. The biological zero temperature of Stage I larvae was estimated at 9.4 degrees C by the Belehradek's expression fitted to the relationship between intermoult period and temperature (V=48.716 (T-9.425)(-0.579)). The growth rate and moult increment remained greater at 18.2 degrees C than at 14.3 degrees C throughout subsequent development to Stage IV. Consumption of Artemia nauplii by Stage I larvae escalated from 10.5 to 18.2 degrees C but not at higher temperature. An energetic imbalance at 21.5 degrees C may explain the reduced growth in Stage I larvae compared to animals reared at 18.2 degrees C. In the second experiment, daily photoperiods with 0, 6, 12, 18 or 24 h light did not affect larval survival through the first three stages of development but had a marked effect on intermoult period, growth and feeding. The response to increasing photoperiod changed during development, with Stages I and II larvae tending to grow faster and feed more under increasing light conditions whereas Stage III larvae required some light/dark phase to optimise growth (shortest intermoult period and highest moult increment at 6,12 or 18 h light) and feeding. These findings will assist in refining the culture conditions for early stage]. edwardsii larvae. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available