4.5 Article

Physical activity as a preventive measure for coronary heart disease risk factors in early childhood

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00347.x

Keywords

physical activity; health promotion; child

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physical activity causes acute physiological and long-term adaptive responses in the body. It is a protective factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) in adults. It has been assumed that children younger than 8 years of age may be in general active enough and there would be hardly any relationships between physical activity and CHD risk factors in early childhood. One hundred and fifty-five children (age 4-7 years) participated in this physical activity study during three consecutive years. Physical activity was examined twice a year with a special-purpose physical activity diary. CHD risk factors were measured during annual health care visits in the Specific Turku Coronary Risk-Factor Intervention Project (STRIP). We found that physical activity was related to CHD risk factors in early childhood. Among the girls, low-activity playing was related to a higher BMI. At the mean age of 6 years, high-activity playing was negatively related to serum total cholesterol (r=-0.32(*)) and positively to the high-density lipoprotein (HDL)/total cholesterol ratio (r=0.37(**)). The negative relationship between high-activity playing and triglycerides was highest (r=-0.32(*)) at the mean age of six. Among 4-year-old boys, playing outdoors correlated positively with serum HDL cholesterol concentration (r=0.29(*)) and the HDL/total ratio (r=0.35(**)). At the age of 5 years, physically active playing correlated positively with systolic blood pressure (r=0.25(*)). Playing outdoors and high-activity playing already have important health-maintaining effects in 4-7-year-old children. These positive effects differ between genders. (P-*<0.05 P-**<0.01)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available