4.8 Article

Multipopulation model of membrane-aerated biofilms

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 11, Pages 3176-3183

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es034809y

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biofilms cultivated on oxygen-filled gas-permeable membranes grow differently than conventional biofilms, as the chemical species required for growth diffuse from different sides of the biofilm. Oxygen is delivered directly to the base of the biofilm by the membrane, while organic substrates and other soluble nutrients are provided to the upper surface of the biofilm via the water in which the membranes are immersed. This counter diffusion of nutrients results in a growth environment very different from that of conventional biofilms that receive both oxygen and other nutrients from the water. In recent years, membrane-supported biofilms have been shown to simultaneously remove chemical oxygen demand (COD) and inorganic nitrogen from wastewater in laboratory studies. Several investigators have developed computer models of these biofilms, but they have all focused on a single population of aerobic bacteria. While these models are useful in characterizing the behavior of these biofilms in pure cultures, they are not useful in modeling the behavior of the biofilms in mixed cultures such as those found in wastewater treatment. In this study, a multipopulation biofilm model was developed that includes aerobic heterotrophs, nitrifiers, denitrifiers, and acetoclastic methanogens. The model was constructed with Aquasim software and can predict the COD and inorganic nitrogen removal behavior observed previously in experimental studies. In this paper we present examples of predicted biofilm behavior and compare the results of this multiple-population model with the single-population models published previously. In addition, the behavior of the biofilm is discussed in terms of application to wastewater treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available