4.5 Article

Use of phosphocreatine kinetics to determine the influence of creatine on muscle mitochondrial respiration:: an in vivo 31P-MRS study of oral creatine ingestion

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages 2288-2292

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01021.2003

Keywords

skeletal muscle; creatine kinase; mitochondria; phosphocreatine; phosphorous-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent human isolated muscle fiber studies suggest that phosphocreatine (PCr) and creatine (Cr) concentrations play a role in the regulation of mitochondrial respiration rate. To determine whether similar regulatory mechanisms are present in vivo, this study examined the relationship between skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiration rate and end-exercise PCr, Cr, PCr-to-Cr ratio (PCr/Cr), ADP, and pH by using P-31-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in 16 men and women (36.9+/-4.6 yr). The initial PCr resynthesis rate and time constant (T-c) were used as indicators of mitochondrial respiration after brief (10-12 s) and exhaustive (1-4 min) dynamic knee extension exercise performed in placebo and creatine-supplemented conditions. The results show that the initial PCr resynthesis rate has a strong relationship with end-exercise PCr, Cr, and PCr/Cr (r>0.80, P<0.001), a moderate relationship with end-exercise ADP (r=0.77, P<0.001), and no relationship with end-exercise pH (r=-0.14, P=0.34). The PCr T-c was not as strongly related to PCr, Cr, PCr/Cr, and ADP (r<0.77, P<0.001-0.18) and was significantly influenced by end-exercise pH (r=-0.43, P<0.01). These findings suggest that end-exercise PCr and Cr should be taken into consideration when PCr recovery kinetics is used as an indicator of mitochondrial respiration and that the initial PCr resynthesis rate is a more reliable indicator of mitochondrial respiration compared with the PCr T-c.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available