4.7 Article

High expression levels of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein and survivin correlate with poor overall survival in childhood de Novo acute myeloid leukemia

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 3737-3744

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0642

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Apoptosis-related proteins are important molecules for predicting chemotherapy response and prognosis in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, data on the expression and prognostic impact of these molecules in childhood AML are rare. Experimental Design: Using flow cytometry and Western blot analysis, we, therefore, investigated 45 leukemic cell samples from children with de novo AML enrolled and treated within the German AML-BFM93 study for the expression of apoptosis-regulating proteins [CD95, Bcl-2, Bax, Bcl-xL, procaspase-3, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein-1 (cIAP-1), survivin]. Results: XIAP (P < 0.002) but no other apoptosis regulators showed maturation-dependent expression differences as determined by French-American-British (FAB) morphology with the highest expression levels observed within the immature M0/1 subtypes. XIAP (P < 0.01) and Bcl-xL (P < 0.01) expression was lower in patients with favorable rather than intermediate/poor cytogenetics. After a mean follow-up of 34 months, a shorter overall survival was associated with high expression levels of XIAP [30 (n = 10) versus 41 months (n = 34); P < 0.05] and survivin [27 (n = 10) versus 41 months (n = 34); P < 0.05]. Conclusions: We conclude that apoptosis-related molecules are associated with maturation stage, cytogenetic risk groups, and therapy outcome in childhood de novo AML. The observed association of XIAP with immature FAB types, intermediate/poor cytogenetics, and poor overall survival should be confirmed within prospective pediatric AML trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available