4.7 Article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of local energy management based on urban-rural cooperation in China

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 64, Issue 1-2, Pages 224-232

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.12.049

Keywords

Cost-effectiveness analysis; Local energy management; Urban-rural cooperation; Local carbon price

Funding

  1. Key Fund of Shanghai Science Technology Committee [13160501000]
  2. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The urban and rural areas usually illustrate distinguishing yet complementary features from natural, energy, economic and other aspects; thus, it is beneficial to consider them in a systematic and cooperative manner so as to develop a low-carbon society in the local area. In this study, the paths toward regional de-carbonization are indicated by conceptualizing systematic urban-rural cooperation that creates regional circulation of energy resources. As an illustrative example, an investigation has been conducted of assumed local energy systems for a model city. By developing a bottom-up energy system optimization model to include not only cost minimization but also emissions minimization, the proposed wide urban rural energy systems are examined from both economic and environmental viewpoints. According to the simulation results, the energy system based on urban rural mutual cooperation is the best option from both economic and environmental viewpoints, which results in cost-effective CO2 emissions reduction up to 50% below current level. In addition, by endowing an economic value to the reduced CO2 emissions through the local carbon price, the economic and environmental benefits for urban and rural areas can be shared and balanced between both sides. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available