4.7 Article

Composite block of magnesium hydroxide - Expanded graphite for chemical heat storage and heat pump

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 69, Issue 1-2, Pages 29-38

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.04.037

Keywords

Chemical heat pump; Chemical heat storage; Magnesium hydroxide; Expanded graphite; Composite block; Thermal conductivity

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [24360404]
  2. COURSE 50 project of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical heat storage/chemical heat pump technology (CHS/CHP) based on the reversible gas-solid chemical reactions between magnesium oxide, water, and magnesium hydroxide (MgO/H2O/Mg(OH)(2)) requires enhanced thermal conductivity for the packed bed reactors. A composite material of expanded graphite (EG) and Mg(OH)(2), EM8, was prepared. Mg(OH)(2) and EG, used in the preparation of EM8, were mixed at the optimal mass mixing ratio of 8:1. EM8 was then compressed into a cylindrical block with dimensions matching that of the reactor of a CHP apparatus (diameter phi(reactor) = 48 min, height Z(reactor) = 48 mm). The dehydration and hydration reactions, corresponding to the heat storage and heat output mode of the CHP, were carried out using the apparatus by inserting the EMS block directly into the reactor. The results were compared with those obtained under the same reaction conditions by filling the reactor with a packed bed of Mg(OH)(2) pellets. The results show that after 120 min of dehydration at 400 degrees C, the EMS block had a volumetric heat storage (q(d,v)) of 747 MJ m(bed)(-3), while that for the bed of Mg(OH)(2) pellets was 502 MJ m(bed)(-3). After 60 min of hydration at water vapor pressure of 361 kPa, the EM8 block had a gross heat output (q(h,v)) of 911 MJ m(bed)(-3), while that for the bed of Mg(OH)(2) pellets was 497 MJ m(bed)(-3). Kinetic analysis for the hydration reaction indicated that in the EMS block, the hydration rate was controlled by mass transfer for P-h < 101 kPa, while it was controlled by heat transfer for P-h > 101 kPa. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available