4.7 Article

Heat release performance of direct-contact heat exchanger with erythritol as phase change material

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 28-35

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.07.024

Keywords

Thermal energy storage; Phase change material; Latent heat; Heat exchange; Direct contact

Funding

  1. project CO2 Ultimate Reduction in Steelmaking Process by Innovative Technology for Cool Earth 50 of New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes heat-release performance of a direct-contact heat exchanger using erythritol as a phase change material (PCM) along with a heat-transfer oil (HTO). A vertical cylinder with an inner diameter of 200 mm and a height of 1000 mm was used as a heat-storage unit (HSU). A nozzle with nine holes in diameter of 3.0 mm facing vertically downward was placed at the bottom of HSU. We examined the effects of flow rate of HTO and the height of PCM layer in the HSU, on three characteristic parameters of heat release temperature effectiveness, heat release rate, and volumetric heat transfer coefficient. Consequently, we determined optimum conditions under which the HTO uniformly flowed in the PCM. When the HTO uniformly flow and the height of PCM was constant, the temperature effectiveness was high and the heat release rate was proportional to the flow rate of HTO. In addition, a high temperature effectiveness over 0.83 was observed even when the height of PCM was 0.2 m. Further, the average volumetric heat transfer coefficient increased with increasing the flow rate of HTO and decreasing the height of PCM. These results revealed that the direct-contact heat exchanger can rapidly, efficiently, and compactly release the latent heat of PCM provided that HTO uniformly flows. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available