4.7 Article

SDOCKER: A method utilizing existing X-ray structures to improve docking accuracy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 3142-3148

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jm040015y

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new strategy for structure-based drug design that combines high-quality docking with data from existing ligand-protein cocrystal X-ray structures. The main goal of SDOCKER, a new algorithm that implements this strategy, is docking accuracy improvement. In this new paradigm, simulated annealing molecular dynamics is used for conformational sampling and optimization and an additional similarity force is applied on the basis of the positions of ligands from X-ray data that focus the sampling on relevant regions of the active site. Because the structural information from both the ligand and protein active site is included, this approach is more effective in finding the optimal conformation for a ligand-protein complex than the classical docking or similarity overlays. Interestingly, it was found that a 3D similarity-only approach gives comparable docking accuracy to the regular force field approach used in classical docking, given the final structures are minimized in the presence of the protein. The combination of both, as implemented in SDOCKER, is shown here to be more accurate. A significant improvement in docking accuracy has been observed for three different test systems. Specifically an improvement of 10%, 17.5%, and 10% is seen for 37 HIV-1 protease, 32 thrombin, and 23 CDK2 ligands, respectively, compared to docking using the force field alone. In addition, SDOCKER's accuracy performance dependence on the similarity template is discussed. The strategy of utilizing existing ligand X-ray information should prove effective in light of the multitude of structures available from structural genomics approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available