Journal
CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 2707-2721Publisher
WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200305686
Keywords
DFT calculations; isotope effects; kinetics; oxidation; quinones; radicals
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The effect of pressure on the oxidation of hydroarenes 3-9 with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-quinone (DDQ; 1a) or o-chloranil (10), leading to the corresponding arenes, has been investigated. The activation volumes were determined from the pressure dependence of the rate constants of these reactions monitored by on-line UV/Vis spectroscopic measurements in an optical high-pressure cell (up to 3500 bar). The finding that they are highly negative and only moderately dependent on the solvent polarity (DeltaV(double dagger) = -13 to -25 in MTBE and -15 to -29 cm(3) mol(-1) in MeCN/AcOEt, 1:1) rules out the formation of ionic species in the rate-determining step and is good evidence for a hydrogen atom transfer mechanism leading to a pair of radicals in the rate-determining step, as of was also suggested by kinetic measurements, studies of kinetic isotope effects, and spin-trapping experiments. The strong pressure dependence of the kinetic deuterium isotope effect for the reaction of 9,10-dihydroanthracene 5159,9,10,10-D-4 with DDQ (1a) can be attributed to a tunneling component in the hydrogen transfer. In the case of formal 1,3-dienes and enes possessing two vicinal C-H bonds, which have to be cleaved during the dehydrogenation, a pericyclic hydrogen transfer has to considered as one mechanistic alterna- live. The comparison of the kinetic deuterium isotope effects determined for the oxidation of tetralin 9/9-1,1,4,4D(4)/9-2,2,3,3-D-4/9-D-12 either with DDQ (1a) or with thymoquinone le indicates that the reaction with DDQ (1a) proceeds in a stepwise manner through hydrogen atom transfer, analogously to the oxidations of 1,4-dihydroarenes, whereas the reaction with thymoquinone 1c is concerted, following the course of a pericyclic hydrogen transfer. The difference in the mechanistic courses of these two reactions may be explained by the effect of the CN and Cl substituents in 1a, which stabilize a radical intermediate better than the alkyl groups in 1c. The mechanistic conclusions are substantiated by DFT calculations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available