4.7 Article

Multiscale modeling of θ′ precipitation in Al-Cu binary alloys

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 52, Issue 10, Pages 2973-2987

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.001

Keywords

multiscale modeling; Al-Cu; theta ' precipitates; equilibrium aspect ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a multiscale model for studying the growth and coarsening of theta' precipitates in Al-Cu alloys. Our approach utilizes a novel combination of the mesoscale phase-field method with atomistic approaches such as first-principles total energy and linear response calculations, as well as a mixed-space cluster expansion coupled with Monte Carlo simulations. We give quantitative first-principles predictions of. (i) bulk energetics of the Al-Cu solid solution and theta' precipitate phases, (ii) interfacial energies of the coherent and semi-coherent theta'/Al interfaces, and (iii) stress-free misfit strains and coherency strain energies of the theta'/Al system. These first-principles data comprise all the necessary energetic information to construct our phase-field model of microstructural evolution. Using our multiscale approach, we elucidate the effects of various energetic contributions on the equilibrium shape of theta' precipitates, finding that both the elastic energy and interfacial energy anisotropy contributions play critical roles in determining the aspect ratio of theta' precipitates. Additionally, we have performed a quantitative study of the morphology of two-dimensional multi-precipitate microstructures during growth and coarsening, and compared the calculated results with experimentally observed morphologies. Our multiscale first-principles/phase-field method is completely general and should therefore be applicable to a wide variety of problems in microstructural evolution. (C) 2004 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available