4.7 Article

Fabrication of large SU-8 mold with high aspect ratio microchannels by UV exposure dose reduction

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 101, Issue 1-2, Pages 175-182

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2004.02.049

Keywords

high aspect ratio; UV exposure dose; SU-8; diffraction; PDMS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patterned SU-8 can be used as a master mold for soft lithography. Fabrication of SU-8 molds with high aspect ratio microchannels for this purpose is non-trivial due to the contrary imperatives of mold hardness and faithful replication of the photomask pattern. Increased UV exposure time, which improves resist hardness, is found to result in overexposure of the shadowed resist and unresolved pattern structure in the wafer center. We have found that reduction of UV exposure dose from the resist manufacturer's recommendation of 500-600 mJ/cm(2) to 350 mJ/cm(2) permits the successful fabrication of dense SU-8 gratings with relatively wide (80 mum) SU-8 bars separated by narrow (10 mum) microchannels with aspect ratio of 10 over the entire 100 mm-diameter wafer. The underexposed SU-8 was rather soft but could be sufficiently hardened to attain a useable hardness (Vickers hardness (VH) number of 25) by hard baking at a relatively low temperature (95 degreesC). A hard baking time of 20 min resulted in saturation of the hardness; further increase of hard baking time resulted in no significant increase in hardness. The hard-baked SU-8 gratings were successfully used for replication of soft silicone rubber. Without hard-baking, the silicone rubber broke cohesively within the SU-8 gratings during demolding. A method of fabricating 100 mm-diameter SU-8 mold consisting of 80 mum wide SU-8 bars separated by 10 mum narrow channels with aspect ratio of 10 for soft lithography has been demonstrated. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available