4.7 Article

Optimum thermal design of microchannel heat sink with triangular reentrant cavities

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 31, Issue 6-7, Pages 1208-1219

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.12.022

Keywords

Triangular reentrant cavities; Microchannel; Numerical simulation; Geometric parameters

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50876003]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing [3092009]
  3. Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality [PHR200906104]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20070005009]
  5. Beijing University of Technology [ykj-2010-3612]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of geometric parameters on water flow and heat transfer characteristics in microchannel heat sink with triangular reentrant cavities is numerically investigated. A three-dimensional laminar flow model, consisting of Navier Stokes equations and energy conservation equation, with the conjugate heat transfer between the silicon base and water taken into consideration is solved numerically. In order to find the optimum geometric parameters, four variables, representing the distance and geometry of the triangular reentrant cavity, are designed. It is found that the vortices in the triangular reentrant cavities lead to chaotic advection and can greatly enhance the convective fluid mixing. The thermal and hydraulic boundary layers are interrupted and the repeated developing flow enhances heat transfer in the constant cross-section segment. Furthermore, the effects of the four design variables on heat transfer augmentation and pressure drop penalty are investigated depending on different Reynolds numbers by using the simulated annealing method. Based on the thermal enhancement factor performance maps, the optimal geometric parameters are obtained in principle. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available