Drug use by pregnant women and comparable non-pregnant women in The Netherlands with reference to the Australian classification system

Objective: To describe drug use in pregnancy, and compare drug use of pregnant women with non-pregnant women with respect to possible teratogenicity. Study design: A cross-sectional study based on pharmacy records from 1997 to 2001 was performed. Pregnant women and matched non-pregnant women (same physician and age) were identified. Prescriptions were set against the Australian risk classification. Results: Thirty-five percent of all prescriptions for non-pregnant women were safe in pregnancy (Australian classification A), in 14% the risk was unknown (B1, B2), 49% were potentially harmful drugs (B3, C, D, X), and in 3% no classification was available. For pregnant women these figures were 86, 3, 10 and 2%, respectively. In non-pregnant women the highest percentages of prescriptions for unsafe drugs were for psycholeptics (99% not classified as safe), psychoanaleptics (100%), anti-inflammatory/antirheumetic products (100%), antihistamines (94%), antacids/anti-ulcer drugs (81%), antiepileptics (100%), beta-blockers (100%), systemic antimycotics (100%), antiprotozoals (97%), diuretics (100%) and immunosuppressives (100%). In pregnant women this pattern was comparable, except for antihistamines (22%) and antacids/anti-ulcer drugs (3%). Conclusion: We conclude that many drugs used by non-pregnant women should be avoided in pregnancy, and that pregnant women indeed do so. However, for some drug groups the available safe alternatives are limited. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.