4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Quantification issues of trace metal contaminants on silicon wafers by means of TOF-SIMS, ICP-MS, and TXRF

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages 720-724

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.03.030

Keywords

trace metals; TOF-SIMS; TXRF; VPD; ICP-MS; quantification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurement of surface metal contamination on silicon wafers is essential for yield enhancement in IC manufacturing. Vapor phase decomposition coupled with either inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (VPD-ICP-MS), or total reflection X-ray fluorescence (VPD-TXRF), TXRF and more recently time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) are used to monitor surface metal contamination. These techniques complement each other in their respective strengths and weaknesses. For reliable and accurate quantification, so-called relative sensitivity factors (RSF) are required for TOF-SIMS analysis. For quantification purposes in VPD, the collection efficiency (CE) is important to ensure complete collection of contamination. A standard procedure has been developed that combines the determination of these RSFs as well as the collection efficiency using all the analytical techniques mentioned above. Therefore, sample wafers were intentionally contaminated and analyzed (by TOF-SIMS) directly after preparation. After VPD-ICP-MS, several scanned surfaces were analyzed again by TOF-SIMS. Comparing the intensities of the specific metals before and after the VPD-DC procedure on the scanned surface allows the determination of so-called removing efficiency (RE). In general, very good agreement was obtained comparing the four analytical techniques after updating the RSFs for TOF-SIMS. Progress has been achieved concerning the CE evaluation as well as determining the RSFs more precisely for TOF-SIMS. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available