4.7 Article

A study of a bubble absorber using a plate heat exchanger with NH3-H2O, NH3-LiNO3 and NH3-NaSCN

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 31, Issue 11-12, Pages 1869-1876

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.02.032

Keywords

Advanced cycle; Plate heat exchanger; Ammonia-water; Ammonia-lithium nitrate; Ammonia-sodium thiocyanate heat pumps

Funding

  1. UNAM [PAPIIT IN109009]
  2. European Union [FONCICYT 94256]
  3. Centro de Investigacion en Energia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a continuous research effort being carried out worldwide on the development of absorption cooling systems with the objective of increasing their performance, one important area is the search for more efficient heat exchangers and alternative working fluids that can improve the performance of NH3-H2O and H2O-LiBr that are commonly used in commercial absorption refrigeration machines. In this work the study of a plate heat exchangers used as bubble absorbers with NH3-LiNO3 and NH3-NaSCN as alternative working fluids is carried out. A mathematical model was developed in order to analyze the absorption process in a bubble absorber with NH3-H2O, NH3-LiNO3 and NH3-NaSCN as working fluids using a plate heat exchanger at refrigeration conditions and low generator temperatures. The results show that NH3-H2O and NH3-NaSCN working fluids obtained higher absorber thermal loads and absorbed vapor mass values than NH3-LiNO3, the lower values for the latter were caused mainly by the high solution viscosity that decreases the efficiency of the absorption process. On the other hand, NH3-LiNO3 obtained the highest COP value from a single effect absorption refrigeration system simulation, however. NH3-NaSCN obtained a higher COP than NH3-H2O; therefore NH3-NaSCN seems to be a good working fluid to be tested in an absorption machine. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available