4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Preliminary experimental study of single screw expander prototype

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 31, Issue 17-18, Pages 3684-3688

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.01.019

Keywords

Single screw; Expander; Performance test; Lubrication

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficient heat conversion of low temperature heat source is a key problem for energy saving, especially in the fields of waste heat recovery and renewable energy utilization. At present, technical bottleneck for low temperature thermal power is lack of suitable prime mover. As the core component of general machinery, single screw has many good features, including balanced loading of the main screw, low leakage, low noise, low vibration and long working life, etc. If single screw technology is applied to the field of expander, more efficient prime mover would be possibly obtained, compared with pistol expander, scroll expander and twin screw expander, and so on. In order to verify the performance of the prototype, the function experiment was made. In this paper, compressed air was used as working fluid and performance test for the prototype was finished at conditions including different intake flow, different humidity, constant torque, and constant rotational speed. From the experimental data, it is shown that the power output is 5 kW, exhaust temperature is -45 degrees C, difference between the import and export is about 62 degrees C, in the conditions of inlet pressure at 0.6 MPa and rotational speed 2850 rpm. The test results also show that the single screw expander has good part load characteristics. From the analysis of experimental data, we found that adiabatic efficiency of the prototype is not so high probably because of poor lubrication. The lubrication problem will be considered in the next work. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available