4.8 Review

Live flavivirus vaccines: reasons for caution

Journal

LANCET
Volume 363, Issue 9426, Pages 2073-2075

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16459-3

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Dengue, Japanese encephalitis, tick-borne encephalitis, yellow fever, and West Nile viruses cause substantial morbidity and mortality each year. Modern transportation and the relaxation of mosquito-control measures are largely responsible for the increase of disease caused by flaviviruses. Without effective antiviral drugs, vaccination offers the best chance of decreasing the incidence of these diseases, and live virus vaccines are the most promising and cost effective. However, flaviviruses can recombine, which raises the possibility of recombination between a vaccine strain and wild-type virus resulting in a new virus with potentially undesirable properties. Starting point Recently, Arunee Sabchareon and colleagues reported up to 90% seroconversion rates in a phas I trial of live-attenuated dengue-virus vaccines in children (Pediatr Infect Dos J 2004; 23; 99-109). Other live flavivirus vaccines have also been tested against dengue, Japanese encephalitis, and West Nile viruses. Thus far, efficacy seems promising. Where next Safety issues with the live flavivirus vaccines need to be recognised and addressed. The theoretical possibility of untoward recombination events can never be entirely dismissed, but steps can be taken to minimise risk. The development of non-live flavivirus vaccines should be encouraged.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available