4.7 Article

Effects of fluidization number and air factor on the combustion of mixed solid waste in a fluidized bed

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 31, Issue 11-12, Pages 1861-1868

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.03.013

Keywords

Fluidization number; Air factor; Fluidized bed; Mixed solid waste; Municipal solid waste; Thermal efficiency

Funding

  1. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  2. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) of Malaysia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combustion behavior of mixed solid waste in a fluidized bed was studied. Bed, surface and freeboard temperatures were monitored continuously for that purpose. The effect of fluidization number and air factor on the combustion behavior of mixed solid waste of high moisture content in a fluidized bed combustor was investigated. Mixed solid waste was used as a sample which was formulated from four major waste compositions found in Malaysia namely food, paper, plastic and vegetable waste (green). Combustion study was carried out in a rectangular fluidized bed with sand of mean particle size of 0.34 mm as a fluidization medium. The range of fluidization numbers investigated was 3-11U(mf). The first part of the combustion study was carried out at stoichiometric condition. Results showed that the best fluidization number was 5U(mf) in which the bed temperature was sustained in a much longer period. The second part of the study dealt with the effect of air factor on the combustion behavior conducted at 5U(mf). The chosen range of air factor was 0.4-1.2. It was revealed that the best air factor was in the range of 0.8-1. Energy balance was also performed to determine the thermal efficiency of the combustion. It was concluded that the thermal efficiency was significantly increased at higher air factor. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available