4.8 Article

The IL-6- and lipopolysaccharide-induced transcription of hepcidin in HFE-, transferrin receptor 2-, and β2-microglobulin-deficient hepatocytes

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0403108101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000833, RR00833] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK53505, R01 DK053505] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The antimicrobial peptide hepcidin appears to play a central role in the regulation of iron homeostasis. In intact animals, iron overload or the injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulates transcription of HAMP, the gene that encodes hepcidin. In isolated hepatocytes, IL-6, an inflammatory cytokine the production of which is stimulated by LIPS, up-regulates transcription of hepcidin. In contrast, iron has no stimulatory effect on hepcidin expression in isolated hepatocytes. There is apparently a signaling pathway, activated by iron, that is present in the intact animal but not in isolated hepatocytes. Studies in humans and mice have shown that this iron-dependent pathway requires the presence of Hfe, hemojuvelin, and probably transferrin receptor 2 (tfr-2). To determine whether activation of hepcidin transcription by IL-6 also requires Hfe and tfr-2, we have studied mice homozygous for targeted disruption of HFE, beta(2)-microglobulin, and for a truncating mutation of TFR-2. We show that these mutant mice react normally to injection of endotoxin and that their isolated hepatocytes react normally to IL-6. This indicates that the signaling pathway activated by IL-6 does not require either Hfe or tfr-2. Mice with disruption of the gene encoding IL-6 seem to have a blunted response to LPS, but the statistical significance of the small response documented is borderline. It is therefore not clear whether LPS stimulates secretion of cytokines other than IL-6 that may stimulate hepcidin transcription.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available