4.7 Article

Consolidation of fear extinction requires protein synthesis in the medial prefrontal cortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 25, Pages 5704-5710

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0786-04.2004

Keywords

fear conditioning; reconsolidation; c-Fos; amygdala; memory; infralimbic

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR015565, P20-RR015565] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [S06-GM08239, S06 GM008239] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH058883, R01-MH058883, F31 MH066575, F31-MH066575] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extinction of conditioned fear is thought to form a long-term memory of safety, but the neural mechanisms are poorly understood. Consolidation of extinction learning in other paradigms requires protein synthesis, but the involvement of protein synthesis in extinction of conditioned fear remains unclear. Here, we show that rats infused intraventricularly with the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin extinguished normally within a session but were unable to recall extinction the following day. Anisomycin-treated rats showed no savings in the rate of re-learning of extinction, consistent with amnesia for extinction training. The identical effect was observed when anisomycin was microinfused into the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) but not the insular cortex. Furthermore, we observed that extinction training increased c-Fos levels in the mPFC but not in the insular cortex, consistent with extinction-induced gene expression in the mPFC. These findings extend previous lesion and unit-recording data by demonstrating that the mPFC is a critical storage site for extinction memory, rather than simply a pathway for expression of extinction. Understanding consolidation of fear extinction could lead to new treatments for anxiety disorders in which fear extinction is thought to be compromised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available