4.7 Article

The connection between centrifugal instability and Tollmien-Schlichting-like instability for spiral Poiseuille flow

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 509, Issue -, Pages 331-351

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112004008857

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For spiral Poiseuille flow with radius ratio eta equivalent to R(i)/R(o) = 0.5, we have computed complete linear stability boundaries for several values of the rotation rate ratio mu equivalent to Omega(o)/Omega(i), where R(i) and R(o) are the inner and outer cylinder radii, respectively, and Omega(i) and Omega(o) are the corresponding (signed) angular speeds. The analysis extends the previous range of Reynolds number Re studied computationally by more than eightyfold, and accounts for arbitrary disturbances of infinitesimal amplitude over the entire range of Re for which spiral Poiseuille flow is stable for some range of the Taylor number Ta. We show how the centrifugally driven instability (beginning with steady or azimuthally travelling-wave bifurcation of circular Couette flow at Re = 0 when mu < eta(2)) connects, as conjectured by Reid (1961) in the narrow-gap limit, to a nonaxisymmetric Tollmien-Schlichting-like instability of non-rotating annular Poiseuille flow at Ta = 0. For mu > eta(2), we show that there is no instability for 0 less than or equal to Re less than or equal to Re(min). For mu = 0.5, Re(min) corresponds to a turning point, beyond which exists a range of Re for which there are two critical values of Ta, with spiral Poiseuille flow being stable below the lower one and above the upper one, and unstable in between. For the special case mu = 1, with the two cylinders having the same angular velocity, Re(min) corresponds to a vertical asymptote smaller than found by Meseguer & Marques (2002), whose results for mu > eta(2) fail to account for disturbances with a sufficiently wide range of azimuthal wavenumbers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available