4.5 Article

Ventilatory, cerebrovascular, and cardiovascular interactions in acute hypoxia: regulation by carbon dioxide

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages 149-159

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01385.2003

Keywords

cerebral blood flow; ventilation; hypercapnia; isocapnia; poikilocapnia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the effect of high, normal, and uncontrolled end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) on the ventilatory, peak cerebral blood flow velocity ((V) over bar (p)), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) responses to acute hypoxia. Nine healthy subjects undertook, in random order, three hypoxic protocols (end-tidal PO2 was held at eight steps between 300 and 45 Torr) in conditions of hypercapnia, isocapnia, or poikilocapnia (PETCO2 +7.5 Torr, +1.0 Torr, or uncontrolled, respectively). Transcranial Doppler ultrasound was used to measure (V) over bar (p) in the middle cerebral artery. The slopes of the linear regressions of ventilation, (V) over bar (p), and MAP with arterial 02 saturation were significantly greater in hypercapnia than in both isocapnia and poikilocapnia (P < 0.05). Strong, significant correlations were observed between ventilation, (V) over bar (p), and MAP with each PETCO2 condition. These data suggest that 1) a high acute hypoxic ventilatory response (AHVR) decreases the acute hypoxic cerebral blood flow responses during poikilocapnia hypoxia, due to hypocapnic-induced cerebral vasoconstriction, and 2) in hypercapnic hypoxia, a high AHVR is associated with a high acute hypoxic cerebral blood flow response, demonstrating a linkage of individual sensitivities of ventilation and cerebral blood flow to the interaction Of PETCO2 and hypoxia. In summary, the between-individual-variability in AHVR is shown to be firmly linked to the variability in (V) over bar (p) and MAP responses to hypoxia. Individuals with a high AHVR are found also to have high (V) over bar (p) and MAP responses to hypoxia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available