4.5 Article

Functional MRI during sleep:: BOLD signal decreases and their electrophysiological correlates

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 566-574

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03518.x

Keywords

acoustic stimulation; deactivation; EEG; fMRl; sleep-wake cycle

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prominent local decreases in blood oxygenation level (BOLD) can be observed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) upon acoustic stimulation during sleep. The goal of this study was to further characterize this BOLD signal decrease with respect to corresponding neurophysiological phenomena using a simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG)/fMRI approach in sleeping human subjects. Healthy volunteers were subjected to acoustic stimulation during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. On the basis of statistical parametric maps, the correlations between the fMRI response (both amplitude and extent of the BOLD response) and the concomittant changes in the EEG (delta power and K-complexes) were calculated. Amplitude and extent of the stimulus-induced negative,BOLD effect correlated positively with measures of EEG synchronization, namely an increase in the number of K-complexes and EEG delta power. Stimulus-induced BOLD decreases were most prominent during light (stage 2) NREM sleep and disappeared during slow wave sleep, indicating an influence of the baseline degree of hyperpolarization. Our observations provide first evidence that 'negative' BOLD signal changes during human sleep are associated with electrophysiological indicators of altered neuronal activity. Increased number of K-complexes and delta power reflecting hyperpolarization suggests true cortical deactivation upon stimulus presentation. This sleep stage-dependent deactivation might serve, to protect the brain from arousing stimuli, particularly during the light phases of sleep shortly after sleep onset.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available