4.6 Article

Biophysical characterization of the free IκBα ankyrin repeat domain in solution

Journal

PROTEIN SCIENCE
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 1767-1777

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1110/ps.04731004

Keywords

protein folding; MALDI-TOF; amide H/H-2 exchange; ankyrin repeat domain; I kappa B alpha; functionally disordered proteins

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [P01 GM071862, T32 GM008326] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crystal structure Of IkappaBalpha in complex with the transcription factor, nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kappaB) shows six ankyrin repeats, which are all ordered. Electron density was not observed for most of the residues within the PEST sequence, although it is required for high-affinity binding. To characterize the folded state Of IkappaBalpha (67-317) when it is not in complex with NF-kappaB, we have carried out circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, 8-anilino-1-napthalenesulphonic acid (ANS) binding, differential scanning calorimetry, and amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange experiments. The CD spectrum shows the presence of helical structure, consistent with other ankyrin repeat proteins. The large amount of ANS-binding and amide exchange suggest that the protein may have molten globule character. The amide exchange experiments show that the third ankyrin repeat is the most compact, the second and fourth repeats are somewhat less compact, and the first and sixth repeats are solvent exposed. The PEST extension is also highly solvent accessible. IkappaBalpha unfolds with a T. of 42degreesC, and forms a soluble aggregate that sequesters helical and variable loop parts of the first, fourth, and sixth repeats and the PEST extension. The second and third repeats, which conform most closely to a consensus for stable ankyrin repeats, appear to remain outside of the aggregate. The ramifications of these observations for the biological function Of IkappaBalpha are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available