4.7 Article

Angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade reverses pathological hypertrophy and inflammation in brain microvessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats

Journal

STROKE
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 1726-1731

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000129788.26346.18

Keywords

cerebral arteries; inflammation; intercellular adhesion molecule-1; middle cerebral artery; cerebrovascular disorders

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose-The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) is vulnerable to brain ischemia and stress and exhibits a chronically stimulated brain angiotensin II system, cerebrovascular hypertrophy, and inflammation. Pretreatment with angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists protects from brain ischemia and from stress and prevents the development of stress-induced gastric ulcers in part by reducing inflammation in the gastric mucosa. We studied whether AT(1) receptor antagonists could exert antiinflammatory effects in the brain vasculature as a mechanism for their protective effects against ischemia. Methods-Ten-week-old SHR and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto male rats received the AT(1) receptor antagonist candesartan (0.3 mg/kg per day) or vehicle for 28 days via osmotic minipumps. We studied AT(1) receptors, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and number of macrophages by immunohistochemistry and Western blots. Results-We found increased endothelial AT(1) receptor expression of brain microvessels and middle cerebral artery of SHR. Brain AT(1) receptor inhibition reversed the pathological vascular hypertrophy, increased and normalized eNOS expression, and decreased ICAM-1 expression and the number of adherent and infiltrating macrophages in cerebral vessels of SHR. Conclusions-The antiinflammatory effects of AT(1) receptor antagonists may be an important mechanism in protecting against ischemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available